Risk-Reward Ratio
The relationship between potential profit and potential loss on a trade. A 1:3 ratio means risking $100 to potentially make $300.
Key Takeaways
- •The relationship between potential profit and potential loss on a trade. A 1:3 ratio means risking $100 to potentially make $300.
- •Risk-reward ratio directly determines your profitability math within prop firm constraints. On a $100,000 funded account with 80% profit split, the difference between a 1:1 and 1:2 R:R strategy is stark. Assuming 50 trades per month at 1% risk: With...
- •Set a minimum R:R threshold of 1:1.5 for every trade. If the nearest support/resistance doesn't offer at least 1.5× your stop loss distance, skip the trade — no matter how good the setup looks
Understanding Risk-Reward Ratio
The risk-reward ratio (R:R) measures the potential profit of a trade relative to the potential loss, expressed as a ratio. A 1:2 risk-reward ratio means you're risking $1 to potentially make $2. In prop firm trading, this ratio is one of the three fundamental metrics (alongside win rate and risk per trade) that determines whether a strategy can pass evaluations and remain profitable on funded accounts.
The calculation is straightforward: R:R = (Take Profit Distance) ÷ (Stop Loss Distance). If you buy EUR/USD at 1.1000 with a stop at 1.0950 (50 pips risk) and a target at 1.1100 (100 pips reward), your R:R is 1:2. You're risking 50 pips to make 100 pips.
What makes risk-reward particularly important in prop trading is its relationship with win rate. A strategy with a 1:1 R:R needs above 50% win rate to be profitable (accounting for spread costs, realistically 52-55%). A strategy with 1:2 R:R only needs 34% win rate to break even. A strategy with 1:3 R:R only needs 25% win rate. This mathematical relationship is called the "expectancy formula": Expectancy = (Win Rate × Average Win) - (Loss Rate × Average Loss).
For prop firm evaluations, the practical implications are significant. Most challenges require 6-10% profit within 30-60 days. Using a 1:2 R:R with 45% win rate and 1% risk per trade, your expectancy per trade is: (0.45 × $2,000) - (0.55 × $1,000) = $900 - $550 = $350 per trade. On a $100,000 account, you need approximately 18-28 trades to reach the profit target. With the same win rate but a 1:1 R:R, your expectancy drops to: (0.45 × $1,000) - (0.55 × $1,000) = -$100 per trade — a losing strategy despite winning 45% of the time.
This is why professional prop firm traders obsess over R:R more than win rate. A trading system with a modest 40% win rate but consistent 1:3 R:R produces higher profits with lower drawdown than a 60% win rate system with 1:0.5 R:R. The higher R:R system also survives losing streaks more gracefully because each winner compensates for multiple losers.
Real-World Example
A trader sets a 50-pip stop loss and a 150-pip take profit, creating a 1:3 risk-reward ratio.
Why Risk-Reward Ratio Matters for Prop Traders
Risk-reward ratio directly determines your profitability math within prop firm constraints. On a $100,000 funded account with 80% profit split, the difference between a 1:1 and 1:2 R:R strategy is stark. Assuming 50 trades per month at 1% risk:
With 1:1.5 R:R and 48% win rate: Monthly expectancy = (0.48 × $1,500) - (0.52 × $1,000) = $720 - $520 = $200/trade × 50 = $10,000 gross = $8,000 payout.
With 1:1 R:R and 48% win rate: Monthly expectancy = (0.48 × $1,000) - (0.52 × $1,000) = -$40/trade × 50 = -$2,000 net loss.
Same win rate, same risk — but the R:R difference turns a $8,000 monthly payout into a $2,000 loss. This is why every serious prop firm trader should track their actual R:R from completed trades and optimize their entry/exit rules to maintain minimum 1:1.5 realized R:R.
Firms like FTMO provide detailed trading statistics including average R:R, which they use to assess funded trader quality. Traders maintaining R:R above 1:2 are statistically more likely to retain funded status long-term.
Try It Yourself: Risk-Reward Calculator
Adjust the values to see how Risk-Reward Ratio affects your trading
Risk (pips)
50.0
Reward (pips)
150.0
R:R Ratio
1:3.00
6 Practical Tips for Risk-Reward Ratio
Set a minimum R:R threshold of 1:1.5 for every trade. If the nearest support/resistance doesn't offer at least 1.5× your stop loss distance, skip the trade — no matter how good the setup looks
Calculate your breakeven win rate: 1 ÷ (1 + R:R ratio). At 1:2 R:R, you break even at 33% wins. At 1:3, you break even at 25%. Know your number and track whether your actual win rate exceeds it
Use multiple take-profit levels to improve effective R:R. Take 50% off at 1:1, then let the remainder run to 1:3 with a breakeven stop. Your effective R:R becomes approximately 1:2 with higher win rate on the first half
Backtest your strategy's actual R:R — not theoretical. Many traders set 1:2 targets but consistently close at 1:1.3 due to premature exits. Track your realized R:R over 100+ trades
Adjust R:R targets based on market conditions. In trending markets, extend targets to 1:3-1:5. In ranging markets, reduce to 1:1.5 but increase win rate through range-bound entries
Keep a trade journal tracking planned R:R vs. actual R:R. The gap between these numbers reveals whether your execution matches your strategy, which is crucial for prop firm consistency
Pro Tip
The most effective R:R optimization technique for prop firm trading is asymmetric scaling. Enter with full position size, close 40% at 1:1 (securing partial profit and moving stop to breakeven on the remainder), then trail the stop on the remaining 60% targeting 1:3+. Your worst case is breakeven (on the partial close), your base case is 1:1 on 40% of size, and your best case is 1:3 on 60% of size. The blended R:R across all outcomes typically exceeds 1:2 with win rates above 50% on the partial closes.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Chasing high R:R ratios (1:5, 1:10) at the expense of probability. A 1:5 R:R trade that wins 10% of the time has negative expectancy — you lose $9,000 for every $5,000 you make over 10 trades
Not accounting for spread and slippage in R:R calculations. A 20-pip stop with 1.5 pip spread means your true risk is 21.5 pips — which reduces your effective R:R
Moving take profit closer when a trade moves in your favor, degrading a 1:2 setup to 1:1 out of impatience or fear of reversal
Using R:R as the ONLY trade filter. A 1:3 R:R trade at a random point in the market has no edge — R:R must be combined with a genuine entry signal that provides directional probability
Setting fixed pip targets regardless of market volatility. A 100-pip target on EUR/USD in a 40-pip daily range is a 1:2.5 R:R that will almost never be reached in a single session
Continue Learning
Related Terms
Stop Loss
A predetermined price level at which a losing trade will automatically close to limit losses. Essential for risk management in prop trading.
Risk Per Trade
The maximum account percentage a trader is willing to lose on a single position. Conservative traders typically risk 0.5-1% per trade, while aggressive traders may risk 2-3%.
Take Profit
A predetermined price level at which a winning trade will automatically close to secure gains. Ensures traders lock in profits rather than watching winners turn into losers.
Hedging Strategy
Opening offsetting positions to reduce risk exposure. Some prop firms allow hedging while others prohibit it as it can mask true trading performance.
People Also Ask
The relationship between potential profit and potential loss on a trade. A 1:3 ratio means risking $100 to potentially make $300.
Risk-reward ratio directly determines your profitability math within prop firm constraints. On a $100,000 funded account with 80% profit split, the difference between a 1:1 and 1:2 R:R strategy is stark. Assuming 50 trades per month at 1% risk: With 1:1.5 R:R and 48% win rate: Monthly expectancy = (0.48 × $1,500) - (0.52 × $1,000) = $720 - $520 = $200/trade × 50 = $10,000 gross = $8,000 payout. With 1:1 R:R and 48% win rate: Monthly expectancy = (0.48 × $1,000) - (0.52 × $1,000) = -$40/trade ×
Chasing high R:R ratios (1:5, 1:10) at the expense of probability. A 1:5 R:R trade that wins 10% of the time has negative expectancy — you lose $9,000 for every $5,000 you make over 10 trades. Not accounting for spread and slippage in R:R calculations. A 20-pip stop with 1.5 pip spread means your true risk is 21.5 pips — which reduces your effective R:R. Moving take profit closer when a trade moves in your favor, degrading a 1:2 setup to 1:1 out of impatience or fear of reversal
Set a minimum R:R threshold of 1:1.5 for every trade. If the nearest support/resistance doesn't offer at least 1.5× your stop loss distance, skip the trade — no matter how good the setup looks. Calculate your breakeven win rate: 1 ÷ (1 + R:R ratio). At 1:2 R:R, you break even at 33% wins. At 1:3, you break even at 25%. Know your number and track whether your actual win rate exceeds it. Use multiple take-profit levels to improve effective R:R. Take 50% off at 1:1, then let the remainder run to 1:3 with a breakeven stop. Your effective R:R becomes approximately 1:2 with higher win rate on the first half
The most effective R:R optimization technique for prop firm trading is asymmetric scaling. Enter with full position size, close 40% at 1:1 (securing partial profit and moving stop to breakeven on the remainder), then trail the stop on the remaining 60% targeting 1:3+. Your worst case is breakeven (on the partial close), your base case is 1:1 on 40% of size, and your best case is 1:3 on 60% of size. The blended R:R across all outcomes typically exceeds 1:2 with win rates above 50% on the partial closes.
Calculate Your Risk
Use our free tools to apply this concept to your own trading.