Audacity CapitalAudacity Capital
    VS
    Maven TradingMaven Trading

    Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading: Complete 2026 Comparison

    Side-by-side breakdown of fees, profit splits, trading rules, payouts, and scaling — with cashback on both firms through PropFirmScan.

    PFS Score6.8/10
    PFS Score5.8/10
    Compared8
    Analyzed27+

    Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading — At a Glance

    Audacity CapitalAudacity Capital
    PFS Score6.8/10
    Trustpilot4.4/5 ★
    Total Payouts$245M+
    Profit SplitUp to 90%
    Founded2012
    HQLondon, United Kingdom
    Maven TradingMaven Trading
    PFS Score5.8/10
    Trustpilot4.6/5 ★
    Total Payouts$130M+
    Profit SplitUp to 80%
    Founded2022
    HQVancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    The proprietary trading firm landscape is ever

    evolving, with new players constantly emerging and established entities refining their offerings. Today, we turn our analytical lens on two distinct firms: Audacity Capital, a seasoned London-based operator founded in 2012, and Maven Trading, a relatively newer contender from Vancouver, established in 2022. While both cater to ambitious traders seeking capital, their approaches, market positioning, and operational nuances reveal important distinctions. Audacity Capital boasts a commendable $245,000,000 in total payouts, signifying a mature operation with a long track record, reflected in its 6.8/10 PFS Score and solid 4.4/5 Trustpilot rating. In contrast, Maven Trading, despite its shorter operational history, has already disbursed $130,000,000 in total payouts, achieving a 5.8/10 PFS Score and an impressive 4.6/5 Trustpilot rating. This comparison is vital for traders as it dissects how longevity and established practices stack up against modern, agile offerings, particularly concerning funding limits, profit splits, and crucial operational flexibilities that directly impact a trader's potential for success and profitability.

    Overall Verdict

    Audacity Capital
    Winner

    Audacity Capital

    6.8/10PFS Score

    Audacity Capital wins with 50 vs 40 points, scoring higher in profit split, trust & reputation, scaling potential and 1 more categories.

    Audacity Capital50
    40Maven Trading
    💰

    Pricing & Value

    Maven Trading
    📈

    Profit Split

    Audacity Capital
    🛡️

    Trust & Reputation

    Audacity Capital

    Payout Speed

    Maven Trading
    🎯

    Challenge Fairness

    Maven Trading
    🖥️

    Platforms & Instruments

    Tie
    🚀

    Scaling Potential

    Audacity Capital
    📋

    Trading Conditions

    Audacity Capital
    Audacity CapitalAudacity Capital7 wins
    4 winsMaven TradingMaven Trading

    Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading At a Glance

    A complete side-by-side breakdown of 27+ metrics across trust, cost, earnings, payouts, and trading rules.

    Metric Audacity Capital Maven Trading

    Trust

    PFS Score
    6.8/10
    5.8/10
    Trustpilot Rating
    4.4/5
    4.6/5
    Trustpilot Reviews
    163
    5,045
    Founded
    2012
    2022
    Total Payouts
    $245.0M
    $130.0M

    Info

    Headquarters
    London, United Kingdom
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Cost

    Lowest Entry Fee
    $49
    $19
    Cashback
    2%
    2%
    Fee Refundable
    Yes
    Yes

    Earnings

    Profit Split
    75% – 90%
    80% – 80%

    Scaling

    Max Allocation
    $2.0M
    $1.0M

    Payouts

    First Payout
    30 days
    10 days
    Payout Frequency
    Bi-weekly
    Every 10 business days
    Min Payout
    $100
    N/A
    Payout Processing
    3-5 business days
    Under 24 hours (often under 1 hour)

    Rules

    Challenge Phases
    2-Step
    2-Step
    Daily Loss Limit
    5%
    4%
    Total Loss Limit
    10%
    8%
    Time Limit
    Unlimited
    Unlimited
    Consistency Rule
    Removed — previously required a consistency score of 70+, officially discontinued.
    20% consistency rule on Instant Funding and Maven Mini accounts only. No consistency rule on 1-Step, 2-Step, or 3-Step challenges.
    News Trading
    Yes
    No
    EA Allowed
    Yes
    No
    Copy Trading
    Yes
    No
    Weekend Holding
    Yes
    Yes

    Tools

    Platforms
    MT5, DXTrade
    MT5, Match-Trader
    Instruments
    ~?
    ~?
    Leverage
    1:100
    1:75

    In-Depth Analysis: Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading

    Key Takeaways

    • Audacity Capital wins on 7 out of 11 comparable metrics.
    • Lowest entry fee: Maven Trading from $19.
    • Best profit split: Audacity Capital up to 90%.
    • Fastest payout: Maven Trading in 10 days.

    Delving into the operational specifics, a key differentiator lies in the subtle yet impactful aspects of their challenge phases and trading parameters. Both firms employ a two-phase challenge structure, a standard in the industry. However, Audacity Capital offers a more forgiving daily loss limit of 5.00% and a total loss limit of 10.00%. In contrast, Maven Trading imposes stricter limits at 4.00% daily and 8.00% total loss, suggesting a more conservative risk management approach or a higher hurdle for traders aiming for their capital. This distinction is crucial for traders evaluating their risk tolerance and strategy compatibility. Regarding potential earnings, Audacity Capital presents a superior profit split range of 75.00%-90.00% compared to Maven Trading's fixed 80.00%. Furthermore, Audacity Capital's maximum allocation of $2,000,000 significantly dwarfs Maven Trading's $1,000,000, offering a clearer path to scaling substantial capital.

    Another critical area of divergence is payout reliability and frequency. Maven Trading distinguishes itself with a remarkably fast first payout available after just 10 days, with subsequent payouts every 10 business days. This accelerated access to profits is a strong draw for traders prioritizing quick capital repatriation. Audacity Capital, while still offering bi-weekly payouts after an initial 30-day waiting period, pales in comparison on this front. However, Audacity Capital offers greater trading flexibility by permitting both news trading and the use of Expert Advisors (EAs), whereas Maven Trading explicitly prohibits both. This makes Audacity Capital a more versatile platform for automated strategies and event-driven traders.

    Both firms offer a refundable fee, which is a standard and welcome feature across the industry. They also both provide 2.00% cashback through PropFirmScan, further enhancing their appeal. Analyzing their Trustpilot scores, Maven Trading holds a slight edge at 4.6/5 against Audacity Capital's 4.4/5, suggesting strong current trader satisfaction despite its shorter tenure. Ultimately, the choice between these firms will depend heavily on a trader's individual preferences regarding risk parameters, desired payout speed, and strategic trading methodologies, particularly the need for news trading or EA integration.

    Program & Pricing Comparison

    Compare Audacity Capital and Maven Trading programs side-by-side. Filter by account size to find the best value for your budget.

    Account Size

    Audacity Capital

    Maven Trading

    Fee Split Fee Split
    $2K
    $15
    80%
    $5K
    $49
    75%
    Best
    $19
    80%
    $8K
    $329
    50%
    $10K
    $90
    75%
    Best
    $37
    80%
    $15K
    $649
    50%
    $20K
    $76
    80%
    $30K
    $230
    75%
    $50K
    $170
    80%
    $60K
    $2399
    50%
    $100K
    $440
    80%
    $120K
    $949
    75%
    $240K
    $1090
    75%

    Trading Rules & Restrictions

    Key trading policy differences between Audacity Capital and Maven Trading that affect your strategy flexibility.

    Rule

    Audacity Capital

    Maven Trading

    News Trading
    Yes
    No
    Expert Advisors (EA)
    Yes
    No
    Copy Trading
    Yes
    No
    Weekend Holding
    Yes
    Yes
    Fee Refundable
    Yes
    Yes
    Prohibited
    High-Frequency Trading (HFT), Tick scalping, News straddle trading, Latency/arbitrage trading, Martingale, Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA), Grid trading, Group hedging across accounts, Third-party copy trading/signals
    Expert Advisors (EAs), Copy Trading, High-Frequency Trading, Tick Scalping, Latency Arbitrage, Reverse Arbitrage, Long/Short Arbitrage, Hedging, Martingale, Gamifying, Account Sharing

    Payouts & Scaling Comparison

    How Audacity Capital and Maven Trading compare on payout speed, frequency, and long-term scaling potential.

    Payout Speed & Terms

    Metric Audacity Capital Maven Trading
    First Payout Wait
    30 days
    10 days
    Payout Frequency
    Bi-weekly
    Every 10 business days
    Processing Time
    3-5 business days
    Under 24 hours (often under 1 hour)
    Minimum Payout
    $100
    N/A

    Scaling Opportunities

    Max Allocation
    $2.0M
    $1.0M
    Scaling Plan
    Account doubles every 3 months (2.5% monthly profit for 3 consecutive months with at least 1 withdrawal). Max $2,000,000.
    25% balance increase every 4 months after achieving 10% profit and at least 1 payout per month. Repeatable up to $1,000,000 maximum allocation.
    Max Profit Split
    90%
    80%

    Payout Methods

    Audacity Capital

    Bank TransferPayPalCryptocurrencyRiseworks

    Maven Trading

    Direct Bank TransferRiseCryptocurrency

    Trust & Reputation

    Trustworthiness indicators, verified payouts, and community standing for both firms.

    Audacity Capital

    Audacity Capital

    6.8/10 PFS
    Trustpilot4.4/5 (163)
    Founded2012
    Total Payouts$245.0M
    RegulatedNo

    Unique Features

    • 14 Years of Operation
    • Industry-Leading 15% Max Drawdown
    • Human WhatsApp Support

    Red Flags (6)

    • ~1,555 Fake Trustpilot Reviews Removed
    • UK Entity Being Struck Off
    • Conflicting Self-Reported Statistics
    Maven Trading

    Maven Trading

    5.8/10 PFS
    Trustpilot4.6/5 (5,045)
    Founded2022
    Total Payouts$130.0M
    RegulatedNo

    Unique Features

    • Industry-Lowest Entry Fees
    • Five Distinct Challenge Types
    • No Time Limits on Challenges

    Red Flags (12)

    • $10,000 withdrawal cap per 30-day cycle
    • Wider-than-expected spreads
    • Unilateral 1% risk rule imposition

    Which Firm Is Better For You?

    Our recommendation based on trading style, budget, and experience level.

    Beginners

    Maven TradingMaven Trading
    Recommended

    Lower entry costs starting from $19.

    Why not Audacity Capital? Higher entry barrier at $49.
    View Maven Trading

    Experienced Traders

    Audacity CapitalAudacity Capital
    Recommended

    Up to 90% profit split with scaling.

    Why not Maven Trading? Caps at 80% profit split.
    View Audacity Capital

    Scalpers & Day Traders

    Audacity CapitalAudacity Capital
    Recommended

    EA allowed. News trading allowed.

    Why not Maven Trading? No EA support. No news trading.
    View Audacity Capital

    Swing Traders

    Audacity CapitalAudacity Capital
    Recommended

    Weekend holding allowed. Unlimited.

    Why not Maven Trading? More restrictive time limits.
    View Audacity Capital

    Budget-Conscious Traders

    Maven TradingMaven Trading
    Recommended

    Lowest fee from $19. Fee refundable on pass.

    Why not Audacity Capital? Higher minimum investment required.
    View Maven Trading

    High-Capital Traders

    Audacity CapitalAudacity Capital
    Recommended

    Max allocation up to $2.0M.

    Why not Maven Trading? Limited to $1.0M max allocation.
    View Audacity Capital

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about choosing between Audacity Capital and Maven Trading.

    Maven Trading is generally more accessible for beginners due to lower entry costs. Use our Risk Profile Matcher for personalized advice.

    Audacity Capital offers up to 90% maximum profit split. See our profit splits comparison.

    Maven Trading processes first payouts in 10 days. Check our payout speed tracker.

    Yes! PropFirmScan offers cashback on both Audacity Capital (2%) and Maven Trading (2%). Learn how cashback works.

    Audacity Capital offers approximately 0 instruments. See our full trading rules comparison.

    Audacity Capital offers scaling up to $2.0M. Both firms offer scaling plans for consistent traders.

    Both firms are vetted by PropFirmScan. Audacity Capital has a PFS score of 6.8/10 and Maven Trading scores 5.8/10. See our vetting methodology.

    Audacity Capital: News ✅, EA ✅. Maven Trading: News ❌, EA ❌.

    Final Verdict: Audacity Capital vs Maven Trading

    Audacity Capital is the stronger choice for most experienced traders seeking long-term growth and flexibility.

    Its significantly higher maximum allocation of $2,000,000 and the ability to scale profit splits up to 90% present a clearer path to substantial earnings. Furthermore, its crucial allowance for both news trading and Expert Advisors offers greater strategic versatility, appealing to a broader range of proven traders.

    In conclusion, both Audacity Capital and Maven Trading present compelling opportunities for aspiring proprietary traders, yet they cater to distinct profiles. Audacity Capital, with its decade-long track record, higher maximum allocation, and more generous profit split (up to 90%), positions itself as the more established and potentially rewarding option for experienced traders seeking substantial capital and operational flexibility, including news trading and EAs. While its initial payout period is longer, its overall longevity and total payouts underscore its reliability. Conversely, Maven Trading excels in offering rapid payouts and demonstrates strong current trader satisfaction with its 4.6/5 Trustpilot score. However, its tighter loss limits, lower maximum allocation, and restrictions on news trading and EAs might appeal more to disciplined traders employing manual, non-news-sensitive strategies who prioritize swift access to their earnings. Traders must weigh their personal trading style, risk tolerance, and capital requirements against these nuanced offerings to make an informed decision and maximize their potential for success.

    Ready to Start Trading?

    Get cashback on either firm through PropFirmScan — your built-in discount.

    More Comparisons