Audacity Capital
Blue GuardianAudacity Capital vs Blue Guardian: Complete 2026 Comparison
Side-by-side breakdown of fees, profit splits, trading rules, payouts, and scaling — with cashback on both firms through PropFirmScan.
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian — At a Glance
Audacity CapitalBlue GuardianIn the increasingly competitive landscape of proprietary trading, discerning funded traders often face a critical choice between established players and innovative newcomers. Today, we dissect two prominent firms: Audacity Capital, a seasoned London-based entity founded in 2012, and Blue Guardian, a rapidly emerging Dubai-headquartered firm established in 2021. This comparison is not merely academic; it addresses the core concerns of aspiring and professional traders alike – capital access, profit potential, and operational flexibility. Audacity Capital, with its impressive track record of over $245 million in total payouts, represents a benchmark of stability and long-term viability. Its longevity in the market, coupled with a solid 4.4/5 Trustpilot rating, speaks volumes about its sustained performance and trader satisfaction. In contrast, Blue Guardian, despite its recent inception, has quickly carved out a niche, already distributing $20 million in payouts and offering an enticing maximum allocation of $4 million – double that of Audacity Capital. While Blue Guardian lacks a Trustpilot score to date, its swift ascent demands attention. We will scrutinize their offerings, from profit splits and challenge parameters to payout schedules and trading freedoms, to provide a data-driven perspective on which firm might best align with diverse trading strategies and risk appetites. Understanding these nuances is paramount for traders aiming to maximize their potential in the high-stakes world of prop trading.
Overall Verdict
Blue Guardian
Blue Guardian wins with 50 vs 35 points, scoring higher in pricing & value, payout speed, challenge fairness and 1 more categories.
Pricing & Value
Profit Split
Trust & Reputation
Payout Speed
Challenge Fairness
Platforms & Instruments
Scaling Potential
Trading Conditions
Audacity Capital6 winsAudacity Capital vs Blue Guardian At a Glance
A complete side-by-side breakdown of 27+ metrics across trust, cost, earnings, payouts, and trading rules.
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Blue Guardian |
|---|---|---|
Trust |
||
| PFS Score |
6.8/10
|
6.2/10
|
| Trustpilot Rating |
4.4/5
|
N/A
|
| Trustpilot Reviews |
163
|
1,919
|
| Founded |
2012
|
2021
|
| Total Payouts |
$245.0M
|
$20.0M
|
Info |
||
| Headquarters |
London, United Kingdom
|
Dubai, UAE
|
Cost |
||
| Lowest Entry Fee |
$49
|
$42
|
| Cashback |
2%
|
2%
|
| Fee Refundable |
Yes
|
Yes
|
Earnings |
||
| Profit Split |
75% – 90%
|
85% – 90%
|
Scaling |
||
| Max Allocation |
$2.0M
|
$4.0M
|
Payouts |
||
| First Payout |
30 days
|
14 days
|
| Payout Frequency |
Bi-weekly
|
Bi-weekly
|
| Min Payout |
$100
|
$100
|
| Payout Processing |
3-5 business days
|
1-2 business days
|
Rules |
||
| Challenge Phases |
2-Step
|
2-Step
|
| Daily Loss Limit |
5%
|
4%
|
| Total Loss Limit |
10%
|
8%
|
| Time Limit |
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
| Consistency Rule |
Removed — previously required a consistency score of 70+, officially discontinued.
|
No consistency rule for most programs; 2-Step Pro funded stage has 25% consistency rule
|
| News Trading |
Yes
|
No
|
| EA Allowed |
Yes
|
Yes
|
| Copy Trading |
Yes
|
Yes
|
| Weekend Holding |
Yes
|
Yes
|
Tools |
||
| Platforms |
MT5, DXTrade
|
MT5
|
| Instruments |
~?
|
~?
|
| Leverage |
1:100
|
50
|
In-Depth Analysis: Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian
Key Takeaways
- Blue Guardian wins on 6 out of 10 comparable metrics.
- Lowest entry fee: Blue Guardian from $42.
- Best profit split: Audacity Capital up to 90%.
- Fastest payout: Blue Guardian in 14 days.
Delving into the operational specifics, Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian present distinct profiles that cater to different trader priorities. Audacity Capital offers a profit split ranging from 75.00% to 90.00%, comparable to Blue Guardian's 85.00% to 90.00%. While Blue Guardian theoretically offers a slightly higher floor, both firms cap out at the same generous 90.00%. However, Blue Guardian shines in potential capital scale, offering a maximum allocation of $4,000,000, twice Audacity Capital's $2,000,000. For high-performing traders seeking to manage larger portfolios, Blue Guardian presents a more expansive opportunity.
The challenge phases, a critical evaluation for any prop firm, reveal a tighter leash from Blue Guardian. Both employ a 2-phase challenge, but Blue Guardian imposes stricter risk parameters with a 4.00% daily loss limit and an 8.00% overall loss limit. Audacity Capital, conversely, offers more breathing room with a 5.00% daily loss and a 10.00% total loss allowance. This suggests Audacity Capital might be more forgiving for traders developing their strategy or those with higher volatility approaches.
Payout reliability and frequency also differ. Audacity Capital historically requires a 30-day wait for the first payout, subsequently moving to a bi-weekly schedule. Blue Guardian, demonstrating a commitment to faster access to profits, offers a first payout after just 14 days, also followed by bi-weekly distributions. This quicker access to funds could be a significant advantage for traders prioritizing cash flow. Both firms offer a refundable fee and allow EA trading, providing flexibility in execution.
However, a key differentiator lies in news trading. Audacity Capital permits news trading, offering strategic advantages for event-driven traders. Blue Guardian explicitly prohibits news trading, limiting tactical opportunities around major economic releases. This distinction is crucial for traders whose strategies rely on volatility generated by news events. Both firms offer a 2.00% cashback through PropFirmScan, sweetening the deal slightly for initial participation.
Program & Pricing Comparison
Compare Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian programs side-by-side. Filter by account size to find the best value for your budget.
| Account Size |
Audacity Capital |
Blue Guardian |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fee | Split | Fee | Split | |
| $5K |
Best $49
|
75% |
$70
|
85% |
| $8K |
$329
|
50% |
—
|
— |
| $10K |
Best $90
|
75% |
$97
|
85% |
| $15K |
$649
|
50% |
—
|
— |
| $25K |
—
|
— |
$244
|
85% |
| $30K |
$230
|
75% |
—
|
— |
| $50K |
—
|
— |
$479
|
80% |
| $60K |
$2399
|
50% |
—
|
— |
| $100K |
—
|
— |
$779
|
80% |
| $120K |
$949
|
75% |
—
|
— |
| $150K |
—
|
— |
$729
|
85% |
| $200K |
—
|
— |
$1500
|
85% |
| $240K |
$1090
|
75% |
—
|
— |
Trading Rules & Restrictions
Key trading policy differences between Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian that affect your strategy flexibility.
Audacity Capital
Blue Guardian
Payouts & Scaling Comparison
How Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian compare on payout speed, frequency, and long-term scaling potential.
Payout Speed & Terms
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Blue Guardian |
|---|---|---|
| First Payout Wait |
30 days
|
14 days
|
| Payout Frequency |
Bi-weekly
|
Bi-weekly
|
| Processing Time |
3-5 business days
|
1-2 business days
|
| Minimum Payout |
$100
|
$100
|
Scaling Opportunities
| Max Allocation |
$2.0M
|
$4.0M
|
| Scaling Plan |
Account doubles every 3 months (2.5% monthly profit for 3 consecutive months with at least 1 withdrawal). Max $2,000,000.
|
Account scales by 25% of initial balance every 3 months upon achieving 12% profit. Maximum scaled balance: $4,000,000.
|
| Max Profit Split |
90%
|
90%
|
Payout Methods
Audacity Capital
Blue Guardian
Trust & Reputation
Trustworthiness indicators, verified payouts, and community standing for both firms.
Audacity Capital
Unique Features
- 14 Years of Operation
- Industry-Leading 15% Max Drawdown
- Human WhatsApp Support
Red Flags (6)
- ~1,555 Fake Trustpilot Reviews Removed
- UK Entity Being Struck Off
- Conflicting Self-Reported Statistics
Blue Guardian
Unique Features
- 24-Hour Payout Guarantee
- Six Distinct Challenge Programs
- No Time Limits on Evaluations
Red Flags (9)
- Trustpilot rating suspended for fake reviews
- Three-jurisdiction corporate structure
- Payout denial complaints
Which Firm Is Better For You?
Our recommendation based on trading style, budget, and experience level.
Beginners
Blue Guardian
Lower entry costs starting from $42.
Experienced Traders
Audacity Capital
Up to 90% profit split with scaling.
Scalpers & Day Traders
Audacity Capital
EA allowed. News trading allowed.
Swing Traders
Audacity Capital
Weekend holding allowed. Unlimited.
Budget-Conscious Traders
Blue Guardian
Lowest fee from $42. Fee refundable on pass.
High-Capital Traders
Blue Guardian
Max allocation up to $4.0M.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about choosing between Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian.
Blue Guardian is generally more accessible for beginners due to lower entry costs. Use our Risk Profile Matcher for personalized advice.
Audacity Capital offers up to 90% maximum profit split. See our profit splits comparison.
Blue Guardian processes first payouts in 14 days. Check our payout speed tracker.
Yes! PropFirmScan offers cashback on both Audacity Capital (2%) and Blue Guardian (2%). Learn how cashback works.
Audacity Capital offers approximately 0 instruments. See our full trading rules comparison.
Blue Guardian offers scaling up to $4.0M. Both firms offer scaling plans for consistent traders.
Both firms are vetted by PropFirmScan. Audacity Capital has a PFS score of 6.8/10 and Blue Guardian scores 6.2/10. See our vetting methodology.
Audacity Capital: News ✅, EA ✅. Blue Guardian: News ❌, EA ✅.
Final Verdict: Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian
Audacity Capital is the winner.
While Blue Guardian offers higher max allocation and faster payouts, Audacity Capital's superior PFS score, proven longevity, more forgiving challenge parameters, and permission for news trading offer a more robust and flexible environment for a wider range of traders. Its substantial track record of $245 million in payouts further underscores its reliability and trustworthiness.
In conclusion, the choice between Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian ultimately rests on a trader's individual preferences, risk tolerance, and strategic outlook. Audacity Capital, with its decade-long market presence, a substantial $245 million in total payouts, and a higher PFS score of 6.8, projects an image of stability and proven performance. Its more lenient challenge parameters and permission for news trading cater to traders who value strategic flexibility and a slightly larger margin for error. This firm is particularly well-suited for experienced traders seeking a reliable, long-term partnership with a proven track record.
Conversely, Blue Guardian, despite being a newer entrant, positions itself as an aggressive growth opportunity. Its impressive $4 million maximum allocation and expedited 14-day first payout schedule are highly attractive for ambitious traders focused on maximizing capital access and rapid profit realization. While its tighter challenge rules and prohibition on news trading demand a disciplined, non-event-driven approach, its potential for scaling makes it a compelling choice for skilled traders confident in navigating stricter risk parameters. For those prioritizing rapid scaling and quicker access to profits, Blue Guardian presents a cutting-edge option.
Ultimately, traders should weigh Audacity Capital's established reliability and flexibility against Blue Guardian's potential for aggressive growth and higher capital ceilings. Both offer compelling value, but for distinct trader profiles.
Ready to Start Trading?
Get cashback on either firm through PropFirmScan — your built-in discount.